Summary information
GPS coordinates: 32.44909, 35.61791
Structure is partially visible in Google maps.
The plan is of a triapsidal basilica with an external central apse. The excavated southern apse is, by contrast, inscribed, and one assumes that the northern apse, as yet unexcavated, is also inscribed. The length of the church (excluding the atrium) is 28.23 m, and each of the colonnades between nave and aisles was composed of seven columns approximately 2.60 m apart. The ground plan is slightly asymmetrical; the internal width is 15.61 m at the western end of the body of the church, narrowed at the eastern end to 14.77 m. The minimum height for the springing of the hemidome of the central apse is 5.26 m above the floor.
Like the body of the church, the eastern end was apparently stripped of nearly all items of value before the final destruction in the earthquake of
746 /47 [749]. However, enough remained to give an impression of how the building appeared in its heyday. The chancel was about half a meter higher than the floor of the church. Its projection into the nave was not as great as in some churches in the area, and its relationship to the aisles is not yet clear. It was reached from the nave by a single, centrally-placed step of finely cut marble, and was provided with an ornately carved chancel screen, supported by colonnettes, now lost. Sufficient fragments of the screen were found scattered around the chancel to permit a paper reconstruction. No fragments relating to the ambo could be identified, although amorphous holes in the robbed-out floor of the chancel’s southwestern sector may indicate its location.The synthronus remained in situ against the wall of the central apse, although all its decorative facing stones had been robbed out.
In the middle of the chancel, surrounded by a crudely-laid paving of stone tiles, the top of the reliquary container was located. It had been left undisturbed when the church was being robbed of its fittings. This fact, and the presence of the rough tile work, suggest that the stripping of the church was not an act of outright desecration so much as a symptom of a declining Christian population, and that there were at least a few Christians still interested in maintaining the church for worship right up until its destruction.
Smith, Robert H., and Anthony W. McNicoll. “The 1982 and 1983 Seasons at Pella of the Decapolis.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplement, no. 24 (1986): 95-96.
According to the style of the capitals and the type of a few (illegible) words collected under the chancel’s stylobate, the construction of the building is attributed to the end of the fifth or the beginning of the 6th century. At the beginning of the 7th century, the church would have partially collapsed and would have suffered looting, resulting in particular in the spoliation of the veneer elements. The excavators proposed to place the abandonment of the building either at the time of the Persian occupation, or rather at the time of the Muslim conquest, because the ceramics collected in the embankments presented forms known exclusively to the Umayyad period. The church would then have been restored in a restricted form and used until the earthquake of 747/748.
(translated from Michel, 122, 125.)
Smith, Robert H., and Anthony W. McNicoll. “The 1982 and 1983 Seasons at Pella of the Decapolis.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplement, no. 24 (1986): 89–116.
ADAJ, 24, 1980, p. 22-26, pl. 8-1 I ; 1981, p. 298-299 ; 26, 1982, p. 351, pl. 540 ; 28, 1984, p. 76-77 , pl. 12; 30, 1986, p. 172-176.
BASOR, 240, autumn 1980, p. 73-75 ; 243, summer 1981, p. 12.
Pella in Jordan, 1: An interim Report on the Joint University of Sydney and the College of Wooster Excavations at Pella 1979-1981, Camberra, Australian Galle1y, 1982, p. I 03-110, 127-130.
Pella in Jordan, 2, Mediterranean Archaeology Supplement, 2, Sydney, 1992, p. 153-163, pl. 103-107.
Characteristics
- Tri-apsidal with north and south apses inscribed.
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel
- Synthronon
- Reliquary in chancel
- Ambo on the south?
Crudely-laid paving of stone tiles, sign of declination of supporting community
- Multiple entrances on all sides
- West entrance
- none mentioned
- none
Constantinopolitan
- Protruding apse
- Entrances from the east on either side of the apse
- Π-shaped chancel
- Multiple entrances on all sides
- Ambo on the south
- Exterior chapel to the north
Syrian
- Π-shaped chancel
- Inscribed mono-apsidal
- Room on both sides of the apse
- West entrance
- Ambo on south
- Baptistry in room south of the apse or in the south aisle
- Separate south chapel
- South entrances from side rooms/chapels
Roman
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel
- Tri-apsidal usually inscribed
- Altars in the side apses
- Relics and Reliquaries
- Ambo to the north
- Baptistry outside off the atrium or the north aisle
- Marble furnishings (high status imperial association) and imported fine wares
- Decorative elements on chancel screens [specify]
- Separate north chapel
Syrian to Roman conversion
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel replacing Π-shaped chancel
- Side apses inserted into rooms adjacent to the main apse
- Separate north chapel (suppressed south chapel)
- Liturgical furniture with decorative motifs like those at St. Clemente in Rome
Classification
Roman
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel
- Tri-apsidal, aisles inscribed
- Altars in the side apses
- Relics and Reliquaries
- Ambo to the
northsouth? Baptistry outside off the atrium or the north aisle- Marble furnishings (high status imperial association) and imported fine wares
- Decorative elements on chancel screens
Separate north chapel
The Archaeology of Liturgy Project reflects research conducted at the W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem during the spring of 2023.