Summary information
GPS coordinates: 32.32934, 36.37012
Structure is partially visible in Google maps.
The Julianos Church is part of an insula comprising six distinct houses (A to F on th eplan) placed together quite unsystematically, except that the various walls are approximately at right-angles to one another. Each individual house is more-or-less a simple rectangle, albeit with excrescences, but notably more organised in plan than the whole insula, which has no organized plan at all; its irregular outline resulting from the apparently haphazard contiguity of the six houses.
Corbett, G. U. S., “Investigations at ‘Julianos Church’ at Umm El Jimal,” Papers of the British School at Rome 25 (1957): 45.
House C has the same essential elements as A and B; namely a courtyard, a barn, a stable and a latrine in a corner of the barn (pl. XL VIII). The barn is on the west and the stable is on the south side of the courtyard. The east side is closed by House B, while on the north side of the court we find the south wall of the church nave. In general it appears that the church was built as an extension of the house; making use of some of its walls and superseding others. It overlaps the north-east corner of the house but leaves untouched the stable, the barn and the courtyard.
Corbett, G. U. S., “Investigations at ‘Julianos Church’ at Umm El Jimal,” Papers of the British School at Rome 25 (1957): 50.
It appears that the nave of the church was formed by the re-modelling of walls belonging to two earlier buildings. The first of these, the Triple Gate, was adapted to form an entrance to the nave and part of a colonnade along its south side. The second set of pre-existing walls to be incorporated in the nave are its west wall and the western extremity of its north wall.
These walls were part of House C and it follows that, before being incorporated in the church, the Triple Gate already formed part of House C. While the western half of the church is made up of earlier walls re-modelled, the eastern half seems all to have been built at one time and for the special purpose of the church.
Corbett, G. U. S., “Investigations at ‘Julianos Church’ at Umm El Jimal,” Papers of the British School at Rome 25 (1957): 54.
The church was a single nave building (10.00 x 32.00 m) ending with a projecting apse (diameter 8.50 m, depth 7.00 m). It was accessed from the south by a columned patio opening onto the nave by a triple door (which belonged to an older building), and to the north by a vestibule.
Proposals for the superstructure of the church differ according to the authors. Butler proposed covering the nave and the bedside of the building by a system of slabs resting on arches. Corbett restores a frame on the nave and a covering of stone beams divided into two different levels in the apse and the choir bay preceding. More recently, an engineering-based model reconstructs the building’s manufacturing process by considering structural systems, construction processes, and sustainability measures. It yields three hypothetical roofing systems that depart from the “classical template.”
Rama Al Rabady and Shaher Rababeh, “Engineering the Reconstruction of Hawrān’s Ecclesiae during Late Antiquity: Case of Julianos Church in Umm El-Jimal, Jordan,” Heritage Science 10, no. 1 (2022): 14.
A basalt step (14 cm high), fragments chancel posts in Proconnese marble and pieces of plates were collected in the eastern part of the nave from the 1956 excavations. Their disparate character led Corbett to conclude that the chancel screen had been repaired at least once. A three-step synthronon showing traces of plaster and having an axial staircase was placed in the apse.
The coated column drum found in the part south of the nave, just east of the chancel, could correspond has a table stand. A second chancel stylobate was unearthed in the western part of the nave, at the height of the western pillar of the triple door. It featured weak recesses dimensions (10 x 10 cm approx.), which indicated, according to Corbett, a wooden or metal fence interrupted by an axial po1tillon with two leaves which had left traces.
Surveys have made it possible to recognize, in the west section of the nave, the bed of a first mosaic floor, which was then covered with a plaster floor.
On a lintel broken into two fragments, found on the floor from the Church of Julianos:
This is the memorial of Julianos, compelled to a long sleep, for which Agathos (his) father built it, pouring a tear, very close to the public cemetery of the (people) of Christ. In the end the best people will have to sing forever publicly his praises, as being of his living faithful (son) of Agathos, (the) priest, (and) much loved, age twelve years old. The year 239 (344 AD).
According to Butler, the inscription was originally to be placed above the southern central portal of the church and would match the original dedication, but Corbett rightly attributes it to a reused stone from the neighboring cemetery.
Anne Michel, Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), 169.
The construction of the church – the oldest in Umm al Jimal – is attributed hypothetically to the beginning of the fifth century, according to comparisons made between the decor of crosses appearing on the lintels of the church, and those – dates – from southern Syria.
The church would then have been remodeled, as indicated the replacement of the mosaic pavement by a floor plaster and the addition of synthronon.
The date of abandonment of the building remains unknown.
Anne Michel, Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), 169.
If we are right in assigning the building of our church to the early years of the fifth century and, at the same time, in deducing that it was one of the first specially built churches in Umm-el-Jemal, it follows that the Christian community which (as recorded in Julianos’ memorial inscription) possessed a public cemetery there in the year A.D. 344 must have worshipped in some other place. What that place was can only be conjectured; but two facts may be worth noticing. Our church was built within the framework of a dwelling house, and that dwelling incorporated the remains of a disused monumental structure. One way of explaining these two facts is to suppose that House C incorporated not only a Triple Gate, but also some large chamber to which the Triple Gate gave access. It may be that the Christian community used to meet in this chamber. When the community outgrew its original home it would be natural to enlarge it by adding the walls which now form the eastern part of the nave, and demolishing the lateral walls of the former hall. We cannot be sure that this is what happened, but at least it seems to be a reasonable explanation of the known facts.
Corbett, G. U. S., “Investigations at ‘Julianos Church’ at Umm El Jimal,” Papers of the British School at Rome 25 (1957): 65.
Al Rabady, Rama, and Shaher Rababeh. “Engineering the Reconstruction of Hawrān’s Ecclesiae during Late Antiquity: Case of Julianos Church in Umm El-Jimal, Jordan.” Heritage Science 10, no. 1 (2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00727-0.
Butler, Howard Crosby, and Enno Littmann. Syria: Publications of the Princeton University Archaeological Expeditions to Syria in 1904-1905 and 1909. Vol. 2:A. Leyden: E.J. Brill, 1919.
Corbett G U S. “Investigations at ‘Julianos Church’ at Umm El Jimal.” Papers of the British School at Rome 25 (1957): 39–66.
De Vries, Bert. “The Umm El-Jimal Project, 1981-1992.” Annual of the Department of Antiquities 37 (1993): 433–60.
Michel, Anne. Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle. Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.
Piccirillo, Michele. Chiese e mosaici della Giordania settentrionale. Studium Biblicum Franciscanum. Collectio minor ; no. 30. Jerusalem: Franciscan Print. Press, 1981.
Schick, Robert. The Christian Communities of Palestine from Byzantine to Islamic Rule: A Historical and Archaeological Study. Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam. Princeton, N.J: Darwin Press, 1995.
Characteristics
- Protruding apse with an entrance from the east on the south side of the apse
- Π-shaped chancel
- Synthronon
- In the west section of the nave, the bed of a first mosaic floor, which was then covered with a plaster floor.
- Two from the west to the aisles
- One from the north
- One from the east
- Portico and triple gate from the south
- Attached north rooms (parts preexisting)
- Attached south rooms (parts preexisting)
- None
Constantinopolitan
- Protruding apse
- Entrances from the east on either side of the apse
- Π-shaped chancel
- Multiple entrances on all sides
- Ambo on the south
- Exterior chapel to the north
Syrian
- Π-shaped chancel
- Inscribed mono-apsidal
- Rooms on both sides of the apse
- West entrance
- Ambo on south
- Baptistry in room south of the apse or in the south aisle
- Separate south chapel
- South entrances from side rooms/chapels
Roman
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel
- Tri-apsidal usually inscribed
- Altars in the side apses
- Relics and Reliquaries
- Ambo to the north
- Baptistry outside off the atrium or the north aisle
- Marble furnishings (high status imperial association) and imported fine wares
- Decorative elements on chancel screens [specify]
- Separate north chapel
Syrian to Roman conversion
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel replacing Π-shaped chancel
- Side apses inserted into rooms adjacent to the main apse
- Separate north chapel (suppressed south chapel)
- Liturgical furniture with decorative motifs like those at St. Clemente in Rome
Classification
Mono-apsidal with unique features likely derived from previous structures.
The Archaeology of Liturgy Project reflects research conducted at the W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem during 2023.