Summary information
GPS coordinates: 32.18081, 36.16203
Coordinates are approximate.
In the hope of touching structures from the Roman period in the heart of the castellum, a sounding was carried out in the apsidal building spotted last year, at the intersection of the diagonals of the fort; we hoped to clear one of the administrative buildings of the complex. We discovered that the apse belonged to a church which we named “29”. It is preceded by a courtyard which communicates directly by an island street with the western postern of the castellum.
Since the church uses walls belonging to previous buildings, church “29” presents a plan wider than long. Unfortunately, the mosaic pavement was almost completely damaged both by iconoclasts and by a workshop in the 8th century. No inscription has survived from it. As in the other sanctuaries, added plaster benches rest on the mosaic. The choir testifies to a minimal displacement of the altar; the most notable item is the presence of a niche in the apse, but too low to have been used for an exhibition for the faithful. It will have been rather a more noble place behind the altar to place an object concerning the liturgy.
By way of conclusion, we recall that the Arab historian Yaqut recounts that the disused strategic works of the Limes had been used from the seventh century by monastic communities. It is not impossible then, that the castellum (60 x 65 m) sheltered within its walls, in the heart of Samra, a monastery. And if a hegumen is mentioned on an inscription in the church “82”, it is perhaps simply that of the castellum/monastery, as one of the ecclesiastical authorities of the locality.
Michele Piccirillo, “Ricerca storico-archeologica in Giordania VI (1986),” Liber Annuus 36 (1986): 360.
The church was a small basilica with three naves of squat proposals (12.60 x 13.50 m), ending in a protruding semi-circular apse (opening 3.00 m approximately, depth 1.70 m) which had a small semicircular axial niche in its wall.
To the west, it was accessed from a small square, by a door slightly offset towards the south in relation to the axis of the nave; two other doors opened onto the aisles of the church.
The naves were subdivided by two rows of four pillars supporting arcades; the insertion of the building between pre-existing buildings led to the shortening of the north aisle.
The sanctuary, which included the apse and the last bay of the nave, was delimited by an awkwardly inserted chancel screen; it was accessed by an axial gate.
Traces of embedding in the mosaic indicated the location of the altar in the apse. It was a table with four supports, probably redone and slightly moved, as indicated by two other similar recesses in the immediate vicinity of first.
The line of stones that ran along the curve of the apse could correspond to the core of a synthronon.
Masonry and coated benches were added during a repair against the western and southern walls of the church.
The building was entirely paved with mosaics, already heavily damaged at the time of the excavation. The central nave was adorned with two mosaic carpets. The first, to the west, surrounded by a guilloche border, composed a field of squares separated by geometric interlacing, with figured representations, systematically destroyed then repaired by reusing the same tesserae. The second panel, in front of the chancel, consisted of a simple oblique grid like those of the aisles and that of the part of the sanctuary preceding the apse.
Anne Michel, Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), 194–95.
The date of construction of the church remains unknown; the laying of the mosaic certainly took place in a second phase: the gaps in the pavement show that originally the building was slabbed, at least in the sanctuary. The abandonment of the building is posterior to the iconoclasm, the animated figures of the pavement having been removed and repaired with the same tesserae reused in mess. According to Schick, this abandonment must have occurred during the 8th century; it was followed by sporadic domestic occupation in the Ayyubid period (thirteenth century).
Anne Michel, Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), 194–95.
Desreumaux, Alain, and Jean-Baptiste Humbert. “La Première Campagne de Fouilles à Kh. Es-Samra: 1981.” Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 26 (1982): 173–82.
Michel, Anne. Les Eglises d’Epoque Byzantine et Umayyade de La Jordanie V-VIII Siecle. Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.
Piccirillo, Michele. “Ricerca storico-archeologica in Giordania VI (1986).” Liber Annuus 36 (1986): 335–92.
———. The Mosaics of Jordan. American Center of Oriental Research Publications; No. 1. Amman, Jordan: American Center of Oriental Research, 1993.
Schick, Robert. The Christian Communities of Palestine from Byzantine to Islamic Rule: A Historical and Archaeological Study. Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam. Princeton, N.J: Darwin Press, 1995.
Characteristics
- Protruding apse
- Π-shaped chancel
- Synthronon?
- The building was entirely paved with mosaics, already heavily damaged at the time of the excavation.
To the west, the church was accessed from a small square, by a door slightly offset towards the south in relation to the axis of the nave;
Two other doors opened onto the aisles of the church.
- None
- None
Constantinopolitan
- Protruding apse
- Entrances from the east on either side of the apse
- Π-shaped chancel
- Multiple entrances on all sides
- Ambo on the south
- Exterior chapel to the north
Syrian
- Π-shaped chancel
- Inscribed mono-apsidal
- Rooms on both sides of the apse
- West entrance
- Ambo on south
- Baptistry in room south of the apse or in the south aisle
- Separate south chapel
- South entrances from side rooms/chapels
Roman
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel
- Tri-apsidal usually inscribed
- Altars in the side apses
- Relics and Reliquaries
- Ambo to the north
- Baptistry outside off the atrium or the north aisle
- Marble furnishings (high status imperial association) and imported fine wares
- Decorative elements on chancel screens [specify]
- Separate north chapel
Syrian to Roman conversion
- Τ-shaped or bar-shaped chancel replacing Π-shaped chancel
- Side apses inserted into rooms adjacent to the main apse
- Separate north chapel (suppressed south chapel)
- Liturgical furniture with decorative motifs like those at St. Clemente in Rome
Classification
A mono-apsidal basilica.
The Archaeology of Liturgy Project reflects research conducted at the W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem during 2023.